The doctrine on logos between Heraclitus and the patristic horizon the rationality of the world from the harmony of contraries to indefinite virtuality

  1. Lemma
  2. The doctrine on logos between Heraclitus and the patristic horizon the rationality of the world from the harmony of contraries to indefinite virtuality
  3. English
  4. Tampakis, Kostas
  5. Patristic studies - Key thinkers - Philosophy of science/epistemology
  6. 2008
  7. Chiţoiu, Dan Mihai [Author]. The doctrine on logos between Heraclitus and the patristic horizon the rationality of the world from the harmony of contraries to indefinite virtuality
  8. European Journal of Science and Theology
  9. Plato - Heidegger - Staniloae, Dumitru - rationality - Logos
  10. Click Here
    1. This paper aims to evaluate the significance of the concept of world rationality in European thought from a historical perspective. It is a paper that seems to act as a first draft for the author’s later 2011 article “From Logos to Logoi". Its main premise is that different paradigms of thought are still present today, with important consequences for the understanding of the world, both at the level of macrocosm and at the level of microcosm. After a brief introduction of scientific ideology and language as a pre-scientific dimension, the article discusses the pre-Socratic era as the first paradigm of thought. It underscores how philosophia was a contemplative activity and discusses Heidegger’s interpretation of ancient Greek philosophy. It shows how alitheia had a component of exit from hiding. It then draws parallels with some of Roger Penrose’s recent proposals and then discusses the importance of the concept of Logos for ancient Greek thought. The paper then discusses Heraclitus’ definition of the term and shows that logos was both of the cosmos and of the human being. Thus, human rationality and cosmic rationality acquire a correspondence. The paper  discusses how the Stoics integrated the idea of Logos in their Physics as the divine power through which the universe acquires unity, coherence and meaning. Then, the focus shifts to the cultural fusion achieved in Alexandria, when Greek thought encountered the Scriptures. The paper shows how logos appeared within Christianity at the dawn of its emergence. Christianity is shown to affect a break within the concept, where Logos of the divine and logos of the human are not conceptually symmetrical. However, Christianity created another paradigm for understanding, where knowledge is not a personal act, but in which the Person is an essential component in understanding a world which is created. In the next and final part of the paper, the author discusses current Eastern Christian visions of rationality, heavily influenced by Father Dumitru Stăniloae. The world as nature, characterized by rational unity, exists for inter-human dialogue, as a condition for human spiritual growth. The notion of logos is invoked also with reference to grasping the objective reason of things. One can then talk about the progress of both human spirit and of the world via relationships among things. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of these views for contemporary discussions between science and theology. The author suggests that it would be more appropriate to talk of the rationality of creation, rather than about natural laws. For Christians, the world, cannot have, under any circumstances, a purpose and a meaning in itself. If there are limits in Creation, and if they are not due to man’s Fall, then the understanding of the limit must be positive: it is a limit that creates the possibility of communion, of the encounter, and that proves to engender an infinity of possibilities.